1. A Low Block Arsenal Still Hasn’t Cracked
Wolves arrived with a clear plan: sit deep, deny space, and frustrate. It worked for long stretches. Arsenal dominated possession but lacked the sharp movement, tempo, and unpredictability needed to break a well-organised low block. This isn’t new, but it remains a recurring issue — especially against teams with little interest in attacking.
2. Wastefulness Kept Wolves Alive
The warning signs were there in the first half. Timber headed over, Martinelli couldn’t fully capitalise at the back post, and a prime delivery from Bukayo Saka somehow went unused in the six-yard box. Arsenal had enough moments to make the game comfortable, but failed to turn control into goals, and paid the price later.
3. Viktor Gyökeres Still Finding His Rhythm
This was a difficult afternoon for Arsenal’s striker. Service wasn’t always ideal, but when opportunities did arise, his reactions weren’t sharp enough. His overall contribution lacked impact, and it was telling that the breakthrough came after he was replaced. It’s not panic stations, but his adaptation remains a work in progress.
4. Saka Carried the Creative Burden
If Arsenal needed inspiration, Bukayo Saka provided it. His delivery directly led to both goals, even if neither was officially credited as an assist. While others struggled to impose themselves, Saka consistently asked questions, created danger, and refused to let the game drift. On a frustrating afternoon, he stood out.
5. Three Points Mask a Bigger Warning
Yes, Arsenal won. Yes, the lead at the top was extended. But needing two own goals to beat the team at the bottom of the league is not something to ignore. The late passive spell, which allowed Wolves back into the game, underlined concerns about game management. This felt like a match that could — and maybe should — prompt changes.
Final Thought:
Winning while playing poorly can be the mark of champions — but only if lessons are learned. If not, performances like this will eventually be punished more severely.
